The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HIDEO SUNAMI, TOKUO KURE, AND YOSHIFUMI KAWAMOTO1 ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1808 Application No. 08/172,1012 ____________ HEARD: October 11, 2000 ____________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 27-39, 41-44, 46-48, 52, 57-60, 62, 63 and 66-76. Claim 48 was canceled and claim 77 was added by the Amendment After Final Rejection filed June 8, 1995. The Examiner has since withdrawn all 1The real party in interest is Hitachi, Ltd. 2This application is a continuation of Serial Number 07/914,468, filed July 17, 1992, which is a continuation of Serial Number 07/348,131, filed May 5, 1989, which is a continuation of Serial Number 07/093,160, filed September 1, 1987, which is a continuation of Serial Number 06/465,341, filed February 9, 1983. All of these prior applications have been abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007