Ex parte KUKLA et al. - Page 1




                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                     
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                    
            (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                      
            (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                    
                                                                          Paper No. 20                    

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                              __________                                                  
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                              __________                                                  
                                     Ex parte MICHAEL J. KUKLA                                            
                          HENRY J. BRESLIN, ALFONS H.M. RAEYMAEKERS,                                      
                                    JOSEPHUS L.H. VAN GELDER,                                             
                                       and PAUL A.J. JANSSEN                                              
                                              __________                                                  
                                        Appeal No. 1997-1826                                              
                                       Application 08/304,951                                             
                                              __________                                                  
                                                ON BRIEF                                                  
                                              __________                                                  

            Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
                  This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                        
            examiner’s final rejection of claims 14, 16-18, 20, 22, 24,                                   
            26-28 and 33-34.  Claims 19, 21, 23, 25, 29-31 and 35, the                                    

                                                    1                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007