Ex parte KUKLA et al. - Page 1




                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                     
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                    
            (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                      
            (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                    
                                                                          Paper No. 20                    

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                              __________                                                  
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                              __________                                                  
                                     Ex parte MICHAEL J. KUKLA                                            
                          HENRY J. BRESLIN, ALFONS H.M. RAEYMAEKERS,                                      
                                    JOSEPHUS L.H. VAN GELDER,                                             
                                       and PAUL A.J. JANSSEN                                              
                                              __________                                                  
                                        Appeal No. 1997-1826                                              
                                       Application 08/304,951                                             
                                              __________                                                  
                                                ON BRIEF                                                  
                                              __________                                                  

            Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
                  This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                                        
            examiner’s final rejection of claims 14, 16-18, 20, 22, 24,                                   
            26-28 and 33-34.  Claims 19, 21, 23, 25, 29-31 and 35, the                                    

                                                    1                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007