THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MICHAEL J. KUKLA HENRY J. BRESLIN, ALFONS H.M. RAEYMAEKERS, JOSEPHUS L.H. VAN GELDER, and PAUL A.J. JANSSEN __________ Appeal No. 1997-1826 Application 08/304,951 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 14, 16-18, 20, 22, 24, 26-28 and 33-34. Claims 19, 21, 23, 25, 29-31 and 35, the 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007