Ex Parte KARPF et al - Page 8


                    Appeal No. 1997-1830                                                                                                 
                    Application No. 08/389,860                                                                                           

                            (3)  Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.  Claim                                    
                    12 depends from claim 7 and adds the limitation that “the female is elderly.”                                        
                    However, claim 7 does not recite a “female.”  The recitation of “the female” in                                      
                    claim 12 therefore lacks proper antecedent basis.                                                                    


                                                TIME PERIOD FOR RESPONSE                                                                 
                            This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to                                                 
                    37 CFR ~ 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed.                                      
                    Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63,                                      
                    122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR ~ 1.196(b) provides that, Ã new ground of                                              
                    rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.~                                            
                            37 CFR ~ 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO                                               
                    MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the                                                       
                    following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid                                           
                    termination of proceedings (~ 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                                   
                                            (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                                                   
                                    claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the                                             
                                    claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                                                     
                                    reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                                                     
                                    application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                                                  
                                            (2) Request that the application be reheard                                                  
                                    under ~ 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals and                                                  
                                    Interferences upon the same record. . . .                                                            






                                                                   8                                                                     



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007