THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOMIO NAGAKURA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1880 Application No. 08/370,2221 ____________ HEARD: DECEMBER 6, 1999 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, 8 and 10-12, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We REVERSE. Application for patent filed January 9, 1995. According to appellant, this application is a1 continuation of serial number 07/835,328, filed February 14, 1992.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007