Appeal No. 1997-1880
Application No. 08/370,222
associated with this correlation.” (See brief at page 7.) Again, we agree with appellant.
Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of independent claim 1, nor its
dependent claims 2-4, 8 and 12. Similarly, independent claim 10 includes a limitation that
the pager type is determined from a message sent by the radio page. Therefore, we will
also not sustain the rejection of claim 10 or its dependent claim 11.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-4, 8 and 10-12 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007