THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANTHONY V. GROSSI and PAUL E. STOTT ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1992 Application No. 08/115,3881 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 10 and 15 through 20. Claims 1-9, 11, 13, 14 and 21, which are all of the remaining claims pending in this application, stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention. 1Application for patent filed September 2, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/729,515, filed July 12, 1991, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007