Ex parte GROSSI et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No.                           
                 16                                                                                                                                     
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                      Ex parte ANTHONY V. GROSSI                                                                        
                                                              and PAUL E. STOTT                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1997-1992                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/115,3881                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                    

                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 10 and 15 through 20.  Claims 1-9, 11, 13,                                                                         
                 14 and 21, which are all of the remaining claims pending in                                                                            
                 this application, stand withdrawn from further consideration                                                                           
                 by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention.                                                                                   


                          1Application for patent filed September 2, 1993.                                                                              
                 According to appellants, this application is a continuation of                                                                         
                 Application 07/729,515, filed July 12, 1991, now abandoned.                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007