THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SCOTT R. SUMMERFELT, HOWARD R. BERATAN
and BRUCE E. GNADE
________________
Appeal No. 1997-2026
Application 08/317,108
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before LALL, DIXON and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2 to 1
4, 10 to 15, 24, and 28 to 33, all the pending claims in the
1There were two amendments after the final rejection
[paper nos. 29 and 32]. Both were denied entry by the
Examiner [paper nos. 30 and 33].
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007