THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN W. MEADOWS
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2032
Application 08/229,2781
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 14, which are all of the claims
in this application. Upon reconsideration (answer, page 1),
the examiner has allowed claims 1 through 6, therefore, the
appeal as to those claims is dismissed. Only claims 7 through
1Application for patent filed April 18, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007