Ex parte MEADOWS - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1997-2032                                                        
          Application 08/229,278                                                      


          The Jones patent additionally relied upon by the examiner                   
          in rejecting dependent claims 8 and 12 has also been carefully              
          reviewed, however, we find nothing therein which would                      
          overcome or supply that which is lacking in the basic                       
          combination of the other applied prior art noted above.                     
          Accordingly, the examiner’s                                                 


























                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007