Appeal No. 1997-2032 Application 08/229,278 The Jones patent additionally relied upon by the examiner in rejecting dependent claims 8 and 12 has also been carefully reviewed, however, we find nothing therein which would overcome or supply that which is lacking in the basic combination of the other applied prior art noted above. Accordingly, the examiner’s 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007