THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law
journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RANDY W. SIMON, CHRISTINE E. PLATT,
ALFRED E. LEE and GREGORY S. LEE
________________
Appeal No. 1997-2063
Application No. 08/433,818
________________
HEARD: August 16, 2000
________________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 13-17,
19, 22, 23, 25, 26 and 28-31. Claims 11 and 12, the other claims
remaining in the present application, stand withdrawn from
consideration. Claims 13 and 16 are illustrative:
13. A superconductor device comprising:
(a) a substrate of crystalline lanthanum aluminate; and
(b) at least one film of a crystalline superconductor
deposited on the substrate wherein said crystalline substrate and
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007