Ex parte SMITH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-2149                                                        
          Application No. 08/019,666                                                  


          from the interior of a vehicle.  Claim 1 is illustrative of                 
          the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                             
               1.   An emergency auto visual communication system for                 
          advisement from vehicle to observer, comprising:                            
               a direct current (DC) to alternating current (AC) power                
          converter that is inserted into the vehicle's cigarette                     
          lighter socket or wired directly to the battery of the                      
          vehicle;                                                                    
               a computer with keyboard that controls and communicates                
          to an illuminated electronic display (LED);                                 
               said illuminated electronic display (LED) that attaches                
          to the rear, front, or side windows of the vehicle allowing a               
          message to be displayed on the illuminated electronic display               
          that can be seen through the window.                                        
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Katogi et al. (Katogi)        4,752,771                Jun. 21,             
          1988                                                                        
          Reiser                        4,928,084                May  22,             
          1990                                                                        
               The prior art reference relied upon by the Board in                    
          rejecting the appealed claims is:                                           
          Fahs                               5,132,666                Jul.            
          21, 1992                                                                    
               Claims 1, 2, and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Reiser in view of Katogi.                        

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007