THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SAFDAR M. ASGHAR,
and JOHN G. BARTKOWIAK
__________
Appeal No. 1997-2160
Application 07/548,709
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 22, 23 and 26
through 30, all of the claims pending in the application.
The invention is directed to a communications processor for voice-band telecommunications.
More particularly, a single integrated circuit chip is employed and on that
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007