Ex parte ASGHAR et al. - Page 1

                                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                             
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal                  
                 and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                   

                                                                                                       Paper No. 33                               

                                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                               
                                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                        Ex parte SAFDAR M. ASGHAR,                                                                
                                                         and JOHN G. BARTKOWIAK                                                                   
                                                             Appeal No. 1997-2160                                                                 
                                                             Application 07/548,709                                                               
                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                       
                 Before KRASS, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                 KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                              

                                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    

                                  This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 22, 23 and 26                      

                         through 30, all of the claims pending in the application.                                                                

                         The invention is directed to a communications processor for voice-band telecommunications.                               

                 More particularly, a single integrated circuit chip is employed and on that                                                      

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007