Ex parte BRADY et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 1997-2162                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/280,430                                                                                                                                            

                                This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                                                               
                     claims 1 through 3, 7, 8, 10 through 16, 18, and 20 through                                                                                                       
                     22.1                                                                                                                                                              
                                The invention is directed generally to a mobile lifting                                                                                                
                     device for the disabled.  More particularly, Appellants                                                                                                           
                     disclose on page 4 of the specification a lifting device                                                                                                          
                     including a car with a gate that is mechanically                                                                                                                  
                     interconnected to a docking plate.  A hydraulic jack raises                                                                                                       
                     and lowers the car and is controlled by a DC control system.                                                                                                      
                     The control system includes an “UP” circuit and a “DOWN”                                                                                                          
                     circuit, each containing a switch controlled by the other                                                                                                         
                     circuit.  Operating each one of the circuits activates the                                                                                                        
                     switch, which in turn prevents the other circuit from                                                                                                             
                     operating.  Additionally, as disclosed on page 7 of the                                                                                                           
                     specification, a stage height sensor including a sensor switch                                                                                                    
                     indicates that a particular height has been reached.  The                                                                                                         




                                1The Examiner in the Final Office action mailed July 1,                                                                                                
                     1996 has indicated claims 5 and 23 through 26 as allowable.                                                                                                       
                     Additionally, the Examiner has withdrawn the rejection of                                                                                                         
                     claims 4, 6, 9, 17 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in the answer                                                                                                     
                     mailed January 9, 1997.  Accordingly, all the arguments                                                                                                           
                     concerning such rejections are considered moot.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007