Ex parte BRADY et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1997-2162                                                        
          Application 08/280,430                                                      

               an electrical control circuit powered by said direct                   
          current for operating said jack;                                            
               wherein said first gate includes an electrical latch                   
          controlled by said control circuit and said second gate                     
          includes a mechanical latch;                                                
               a battery coupled to at least a portion of said control                
          circuit for supplying power in the event said alternating                   
          current is interrupted, whereby said car can be lowered and                 
          said second gate can be opened absent said alternating                      
          current.                                                                    
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Grove et al. (Grove)          3,902,573           Sept.  2, 1975            
          Nordskog            4,176,732                     Dec.   4, 1979            
          Shah et al. (Shah)       4,785,915                Nov.  22, 1988            
          Schauder et al. (Schauder)    4,971,178           Nov.  20, 1990            
          Gary                               5,105,915           Apr.  21,            
          1992                                                                        
          Warwick-Smith (Hugh)          1 502 921           Mar.   8, 1978            
          (British Published Specification)                                           
               Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over Gary and Nordskog.  Claims 3 and 18                 
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                  
          over Gary, Nordskog, and Schauder.  Claims 7, 8, 10, 13                     
          through 16, and 20 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §              
          103 as being unpatentable over Gary, Shah, and Grove.  Claims               
          11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     
          unpatentable over Gary, Shah, Grove, and Hugh.                              


                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007