Ex parte KOSLEY JR. et al. - Page 22




          Appeal No. 1997-2167                                                        
          Application 08/137,444                                                      
          inhibitor 6-O-demethylgalanthamine.                                         
               While we agree with the examiner's conclusion that claims              
          50 and 51 are not models of clarity, we find the claims                     
          adequately define the metes and bounds of what appellants                   
          intend to claim by the claim language.  We find the claims are              
          directed to administering the compounds of either claim 2 or                
          31, respectively, for the purpose of being converted in situ                
          in the mammal to whom the compounds are administered to the                 
          known AChE inhibitor 6-O-demethylgalanthamine.  Accordingly,                
          the rejection is reversed.                                                  





                                       SUMMARY                                        
               The rejection of claims 1 through 52 under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          112, first paragraph, is reversed.  The rejection of claims 1               
          through 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is reversed.              
          The rejection of claims 50 and 51 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                    
          second paragraph, is reversed.                                              
               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              
          REVERSED.                                                                   

                                         22                                           





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007