THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KATSUJI MURAMATSU,
NOBUYUKI KAMEYAMA,
and MITSUYOSHI MOCHIDA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2215
Application 08/332,058
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-15
and 18. These are the only claims remaining in the
application.
The claimed subject matter is directed to a camera which
can take full-size negative photographs or alternatively takes
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007