Appeal No. 1997-2256 Application No. 08/427,706 A copy of representative independent claims 6 and 10, reproduced from the Appendix to appellants’ brief, is attached to this decision. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness are: Masui et al. (Masui ‘201) 5,223,201 Jun. 29, 1993 Masui et al. (Masui EP) 333,198 Sep. 20, 1989 (European Application) Claims 6 through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Masui ‘201 in view of Masui EP. Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner’s full commentary with regard to the above noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellants regarding the rejection, we make reference to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 25, mailed January 22, 1997) for the reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellants’ brief (Paper No. 24, filed October 30, 1996) for the arguments thereagainst. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007