THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TOMMY G. TAYLOR,
J. DOUGLAS MANSELL,
JOHN P. SHAMBURGER
and MARK E. WOODYEAR
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2265
Application 08/369,207
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claim 2, which is the only claim
remaining in this application.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007