THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEPHEN NEUSHUL
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2293
Application No. 08/089,311
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, RUGGIERO and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection
of claims 5 and 8 to 23. Claims 1 to 4, 6 and 7 have been
canceled. The claimed invention relates to a light box
scanner in which a scanner is coupled to the light box and
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007