Appeal No. 1997-2293 Application No. 08/089,311 prior art, it is our opinion that the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the claims on appeal. Accordingly, we do not sustain the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent claims 5, 13, and 18, nor of claims 8 to 12, 14 to 17, and 19 to 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007