THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SATOSHI KUNIMITSU, NORIYUKI KAWADA, HIROFUMI
YOSHIKAWA, TAKASHI OKAI, ITSUO MURATA and KOJI HORIMOTO
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2311
Application No. 07/978,957
____________
HEARD: February 10, 2000
____________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 3.
The disclosed invention relates to a position data
acquisition apparatus for providing position data with respect
to an object.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007