Ex parte KUNIMITSU et al. - Page 1




                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                     

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                
            for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.               

                                                                              Paper No. 33                
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                             ____________                                                 
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                             ____________                                                 
                   Ex parte SATOSHI KUNIMITSU, NORIYUKI KAWADA, HIROFUMI                                  
                  YOSHIKAWA,  TAKASHI OKAI, ITSUO MURATA and KOJI HORIMOTO                                
                                             ____________                                                 
                                        Appeal No. 1997-2311                                              
                                    Application No. 07/978,957                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                     HEARD:  February 10, 2000                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
            Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and HECKER, Administrative Patent                                  
            Judges.                                                                                       
            HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        




                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
                  This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                  
            through 3.                                                                                    
                  The disclosed invention relates to a position data                                      
            acquisition apparatus for providing position data with respect                                
            to an object.                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007