Appeal No. 1997-2311 Application No. 07/978,957 integration.” We agree. Seto is completely silent concerning integration in block 5 of the binarization output from block 4. In summary, the obviousness rejection of record can not stand on the examiner’s unfounded assumptions concerning the teachings of Seto. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART N. HECKER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007