Ex parte VERNICE et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1997-2339                                                        
          Application No. 08/177,576                                                  


          conclusion of obviousness.  The examiner has not explained how              
          a person having ordinary skill in the art would have arrived                
          at the composition recited in each claim on appeal, comprising              
          80-98% by weight                                                            
          polyglyceryl methacrylate containing about 50% water.                       
          Accordingly, the examiner has failed to establish a prima                   
          facie case of obviousness.                                                  
               6.  Having determined that the examiner has not                        
          established a prima facie case of obviousness, we find it                   
          unnecessary to                                                              




          discuss the Vernice Declaration, executed December 23, 1993,                
          which is relied on by appellants as rebutting any such prima                
          facie case.                                                                 

          IV.  CONCLUSION                                                             
               In conclusion, we reverse the rejection of claims 1, 3, 5              
          through 8, and 10 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                       
          unpatentable over Georgalas and Martino.                                    



                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007