Ex parte MA et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte CHIN-YUAN G. MA                                
                            and JAMES D. MCCULLOUGH, JR.                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-2344                                  
                               Application 08/273,550                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before JOHN D. SMITH, KRATZ, and ROBINSON, Administrative                   
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                 
          final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 6 through 10.                     




                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007