The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CRAIG V. BISHOP
_____________
Appeal 1997-2375
Application 08/376,2821
______________
Before: WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge,
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LORIN,
Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Upon consideration of the record, it is
ORDERED that the examiner's rejection of claims 1-21
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Jex and Plueddemann is reversed.
)))))))))))) @ ))))))))))))
Application for patent filed 20 January 1995. According to applicant, the1
application on appeal is a continuation of application 08/163,946, filed 8 December
1993. The real party in interest is McGean-Rohco, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007