Ex parte BISHOP - Page 1

                         The opinion in support of the decision being                 
                       entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                            Paper 23                  
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   

                              Ex parte CRAIG V. BISHOP                                
                                  Appeal 1997-2375                                    
                               Application 08/376,2821                                

          Before:  WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge,                     
          McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LORIN,                    
          Administrative Patent Judge.                                                

          McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                               

                      Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                        
               Upon consideration of the record, it is                                
                    ORDERED that the examiner's rejection of claims 1-21              
          under 35 U.S.C.  103 over Jex and Plueddemann is reversed.                 
                                       )))))))))))) @ ))))))))))))                    

          Application for patent filed 20 January 1995.  According to applicant, the1                                                                        
          application on appeal is a continuation of application 08/163,946, filed 8 December
          1993.  The real party in interest is McGean-Rohco, Inc.                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007