THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROGER SPITZ, THIERRY SOTO, CLAUDE BRUN, and LAURENT DURANEL __________ Appeal No. 1997-2378 Application 08/233,533 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before HANLON, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 25 and 27, all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 25 is directed to 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007