Ex parte SPITZ et al. - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 36              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                Ex parte ROGER SPITZ,                                 
                             THIERRY SOTO, CLAUDE BRUN,                               
                                 and LAURENT DURANEL                                  
                                Appeal No. 1997-2378                                  
                                Application 08/233,533                                
                                      ON BRIEF                                        

          Before HANLON, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                  
          from the final rejection of claims 25 and 27, all of the                    
          claims pending in the application.  Claim 25 is directed to                 


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007