Ex parte SPITZ et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1997-2378                                                        
          Application No. 08/233,533                                                  

          USPQ2d 1767, 1774 (Fed. Cir. 1993) ("A patent specification is              
          directed to one of ordinary skill in the art.").  The                       
          rejection of claims 25 and 27 under                                         
          35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, based on written                          
          description, is reversed.                                                   
               As for the rejection of claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                
          first paragraph, based on enablement, the examiner maintains                
          (Answer, p. 4):                                                             
               Since these claims are [sic, this claim is] in                         
               product-by-process language, it is believed that the                   
               process limitations should contain the limitations                     
               necessary to produce polypropylene having the                          
               claimed shape, i.e., "polypropylene powder . . .                       
               obtained by the polymerization of propylene                            
               reproducing in a homothetic manner the shape of the                    
               particles of the support."                                             
               For the reasons set forth above, we find that the claim                
          "contain[s] the limitations necessary to produce polypropylene              
          having the claimed shape."  Therefore, the rejection of claim               
          27 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, based on enablement              
          is also reversed.                                                           


                         Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)                           
               Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                 
          anticipated by Bailly.  Bailly discloses a process for                      
                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007