THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CURTIS P. SMITH, JOHN W. REISCH and RICHARD J. FEEGEL ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2384 Application No. 08/430,083 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WARREN, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 15 through 20, which are all of the claims pending in this application . 1 1A preliminary amendment canceling claims 1-14 was presented at numbered item 5 of the transmittal letter that accompanied the filing of this application on April 27, 1995. This amendment has not been clerically entered.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007