Appeal No. 1997-2474 Page 14 Application No. 08/125,590 Claim 26 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: A digital signal processing apparatus for performing an inverse discrete cosine transform, comprising: ... means for outputting a digital output signal including a sequence of output values; ... a control store of central processing unit instructions ... including instructions to sum values to obtain parts of the output values corresponding to a plurality of symmetry classes .... The examiner fails to show a teaching or suggestion of the limitations in the prior art. To the contrary, he admits that the sole reference relied on to reject the claim, viz., McMillan, “does not disclose the symmetry characteristic ....” (Examiner’s Answer at 4.) The admission negates a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the examiner’s rejection of claim 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Each of claims 14-23 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations concerning symmetry:Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007