Ex parte HARWARD - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1997-2660                                      Page 10           
          Application No. 08/224,407                                                  


          Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkline Corp., 134 F.3d 1473, 1479,                
          45 USPQ2d 1498, 1503 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re Gosteli,               
          872 F.2d 1008, 1012, 10 USPQ2d 1614, 1618 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).                
          Fulfillment of the requirement is adjudged "as of the filing                
          date" of the associated patent application.  Vas-Cath, Inc. v.              
          Mahurhar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1566, 19 USPQ2d 1111, 1119 (Fed. Cir.              
          1991).                                                                      


               Here, the appellant modified independent claim 1 by an                 
          "Amendment Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.115."  (Paper No. 18                   
          at 1-3.)  Accordingly, each of claims 1-11 now specifies in                 
          pertinent part the following limitation:  "data path test                   
          circuitry ... for testing said specific functions of said                   
          plurality of processing elements of said data path, wherein                 
          said testing includes: writing another pattern to said data                 
          RAM and comparing a response from said data path with an                    
          expected result ...."  In summary, the amendment added that                 
          the data path test circuitry writes a pattern to the data RAM.              












Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007