Appeal No. 1997-2660 Page 11 Application No. 08/224,407 The appellant fails to show that the original specification, which includes the original claims, disclosed limitation. To the contrary, the specification teaches that the data path test circuitry writes the pattern to the data path. For example, the specification discloses that "data path tester 50 will send a pattern to data path 30." (Spec. at 8.) It adds that "the pattern that is sent to data path 30 by data path tester 50 is generated by stimulus generator 54 of data path tester 50." (Id. at 9.) The specification further teaches that "a linear feedback shift register is used to generate the stimulus to be output to data path 30." (Id. at 10.) For the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded that when the appellant’s application was filed, the invention included the features of the data path test circuitry writing a pattern to the data RAM as now claimed. The appellant has not shown that the disclosure provides a written description of the inventionPage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007