Ex parte HARWARD - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1997-2660                                      Page 11           
          Application No. 08/224,407                                                  


               The appellant fails to show that the original                          
          specification, which includes the original claims, disclosed                
          limitation.  To                                                             
          the contrary, the specification teaches that the data path                  
          test circuitry writes the pattern to the data path.  For                    
          example, the specification discloses that "data path tester 50              
          will send a pattern to data path 30."  (Spec. at 8.)  It adds               
          that "the pattern that is sent to data path 30 by data path                 
          tester 50 is generated by stimulus generator 54 of data path                
          tester 50."  (Id. at 9.)  The specification further teaches                 
          that "a linear feedback shift register is used to generate the              
          stimulus to be output to data path 30."  (Id. at 10.)                       




               For the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded that when              
          the appellant’s application was filed, the invention included               
          the features of the data path test circuitry writing a pattern              
          to                                                                          
          the data RAM as now claimed.  The appellant has not shown that              
          the disclosure provides a written description of the invention              









Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007