Ex parte YOON - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1997-2681                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/211,414                                                                                                             

                 filter means (24) to be active by recognizing each data                                                                                
                 frequency corresponding to data having different bands when                                                                            
                 said electrical signal corresponds to said information data.                                                                           


                 The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:                                                                               
                 Fischler et al. (Fischler)                            4,894,734                           Jan. 16, 1990                                
                 Abbott et al. (Abbott)                                5,422,760                           Jun.  6, 1995                                
                 (effective filing date Aug. 27, 1992)                                                                                                  
                 Appellant’s Admitted Prior Art (APA)                                                                                                   
                 Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                                                              
                 unpatentable over APA considered with Fischler and Abbott .                                           1                                
                          Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                                                     
                 unpatentable over APA considered with Abbott.                                                                                          
                          Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the                                                                          
                 Examiner, we make reference to the brief, reply brief, answer                                                                          
                 and supplemental answer for the details thereof.                                                                                       


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          After a careful review of the evidence before us, we                                                                          
                 agree with the Examiner that claims 1 and 2 are properly                                                                               
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                                                                                                     


                          1This is a new ground of rejection, made in the                                                                               
                 Examiner’s Answer.                                                                                                                     
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007