Appeal No. 1997-2681 Application No. 08/211,414 Claim 1 The Examiner reasons on page 5 of the Answer that APA (Appellant’s Figure 1) teaches the claimed invention except that the second filter (14), for information data, is not a plurality of filters. The Examiner notes that filter selection control means (15) is substantially taught since it is responsive to the outputs of all filters (although plural data information filters are missing) to allow the appropriate filter to be active. To meet the claimed plurality of filters, the Examiner cites Fischler, Figure 2, noting that a zone code (18) is used to select an information data filter (31-34) dependent on the selected zone to be reproduced. On page 6 of the Answer, the Examiner notes that Fischler does not teach selecting a data filter by recognizing the frequency band in use in the picked up signal. To fulfill this requirement, the Examiner cites Abbott’s filter 48 in Figure 4. The Examiner points out that Abbott’s filter 48 is adapted to the zone [frequency] selected on the disk by recognition of the incoming data stream (i.e., picked up signal). Thus, the Examiner explains, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to have 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007