Appeal No. 1997-2707 Application No. 08/411,127 limitation that “applying one field of chrominance information to both luminance fields of a frame, thereby encoding chrominance components at one quarter the spatial resolution of the luminance components” is not taught or suggested by the applied prior art, we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of sole claim 1. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) vsh 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007