THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PETER A. MONTANA and PETER B. WALSH ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2781 Application No. 08/422,348 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 18. No other claims are pending in the application. Appellants’ invention relates to a screen door having a flexible screen (25) and a rigid, transparent protective coverPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007