THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROBERT F. MEYERSON and YUNG-FU CHANG ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2790 Application No. 08/486,8301 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 25-41, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We AFFIRM-IN-PART. 1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/268,806, filed June 30, 1994, now U.S. Patent 5,594,470, issued January 14, 1997, which is a continuation of Application No. 07/956,112, filed October 2, 1992, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007