Ex parte MEYERSON et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1997-2790                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/486,830                                                                               


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          

                     The appellants’ invention relates to a highly integrated portable electronic work-                
              slate unit.  The workslate having a handle disposed on the bottom thereof containing both                
              power cells and modular processing circuitry.  An understanding of the invention can be                  
              derived from a reading of exemplary claim 25, which is reproduced below.                                 
                     25.    An electronic workslate unit comprising:                                                   
                     a)     a shell including a generally planar upper surface and a generally                         
                     planar lower surface spaced apart from the upper surface defining an interior                     
                     region, the shell further includes a handle extending from the lower surface,                     
                     the handle includes a grip portion spaced from and disposed below a plane                         
                     defined by the lower surface and configured to enable gripping and support                        
                     of the workslate unit with one hand during use;                                                   
                     b)     electronic circuitry supported within the interior region; and                             
                     c)     an interactive display screen supported by the shell, the screen                           
                     forming a portion of the shell upper surface and electrically coupled to the                      
                     electronic circuitry, at least a portion of the display screen being touch                        
                     sensitive for data entry.                                                                         
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                   
              appealed claims are:                                                                                     
              Bradbury et al. (Bradbury)                Des. 297,939 Oct. 04, 1988                                     
              de la Huerga et al. (de la Huerga)          Des. 309,295 Jul. 17, 1990                                   
              Hacker et al. (Hacker)                           5,123,064            Jun. 16, 1992                      
                                   2                                                                                   
              Powell et al. (Powell)                           5,350,909            Sep. 27,1994                       

                     We note that Powell has a filing date after the effective filing date of the present application and is2                                                                                                
              not available under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e), yet appellants have not argued this point.                       
                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007