Appeal No. 1997-2808
Application No. 08/313,129
disposed between said first plurality of magnetic poles, each
including a second predetermined number of teeth greater than
said first predetermined number of teeth.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Satomi 4,385,247 May 24, 1983
Kaneko JP 60-111382 Jul. 27, 1985
Murakami et al. (Murakami) JP 61-185056 Aug. 18, 1986
Claims 2 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Satomi and Kaneko and
Murakami.1
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants
and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief, reply brief
and answer for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
After a careful review of the evidence before us, we
1A 35 U.S.C. § 101 obvious double patenting rejection has
been withdrawn as a result of the filing of a terminal
disclaimer. A 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection has been withdrawn
as a result of Appellants perfecting their priority date.
(Answer-page 2.)
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007