Appeal No. 1997-2874 Application 08/219,160 describing polymers having that restriction on the carboxylic acid content. Nor does the examiner show sound basis for believing that the products of the applicants and the prior art are the same. The working examples of Woodberry are carried out at relatively high temperatures and relatively low pH values, and the examiner has not established that those examples reasonably appear to prepare products which are the same as those recited in the appealed claims. The Woodberry process could be modified by selecting relatively low temperatures, for example, room temperature, and relatively high pH values, for example, pH of 8, per the generic teachings in column 2, lines 22-44, of the reference. However, the mere fact that the prior art could be so modified would not have made the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the modification. In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984). That is not the case here. On this record, the reason, suggestion, or motivation to use “mild conditions” during hydroxamic acid formation stems from applicants' specification, not the cited prior art. As explained in the specification, using “mild conditions” minimizes hydrolysis and gives rise to products having a low carboxylic acid content (specification, page 12, lines 22-25). The rejection of claims 1-7 and 15-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Woodberry, is reversed. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007