Appeal No. 1997-2874 Application 08/219,160 In conclusion, we do not sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 1-7 and 15-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs. Nor do we sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 1-7 and 15-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Woodberry or Vio. The examiner's decision is reversed. REVERSED Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) William F. Smith ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Douglas W. Robinson ) Administrative Patent Judge ) SDW/cam 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007