THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 10 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DENNIS W. JOHNSON, PERVAJE A. BHAT and THOMAS R. GOOTS __________ Appeal No. 97-2914 Application no. 08/448,0601 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before DOWNEY, WILLIAM F. SMITH and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges, DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the final rejection of claims 9-14. Claim 9, the only independent claim, is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: A system for removing SO3 and SO2 from a flue gas produced by the burning of a fossil fuel, comprising: 1 This application is a divisional continuation of US appl. no. 08/235,597, filed April 29, 1994. The claims of 08/235,597 also are the subject of appeal no. 97-1551, which is being decided concurrently with the instant appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007