Ex parte PARIKH et al. - Page 1

                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                             
                 (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                               
                 (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                             
                                                                                                           Paper No. 15                                 

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                  Ex parte SHRIKANT N. PARIKH,                                                                          
                                                     GEORGE C. MANTHURUTHIL,                                                                            
                                                            and HARI N. REDDY                                                                           
                                                          Appeal No. 1997-2988                                                                          
                                                    Application No. 08/045,499                                                                          
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            

                 Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent                                                                              
                 HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                 

                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                                                                          
                 1 through 3 and 5 through 12.  In an Amendment After Final1                                                                            

                          1The amendment was submitted in response to the new ground                                                                    
                 of rejection in the Answer.                                                                                                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007