Appeal No. 1997-2989
Application No. 08/280,343
and removing the call (request) from that remote station from
the queue of the pending calls. Lewis communicates only with
the remote station whose call (request) has been activated by
the host (col. 7) and there is no communication between the
host and a remote prior to this activation. Thus, we do not
sustain the anticipation rejection of claim 21 and its grouped
claims 4, 14, 19 over Lewis.
In conclusion, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1 to 10, 12 to 15, 17 to 19 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. §
102 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007