The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARTIN ROTH, ROGER SALVIN, KURT MEIER,
BERNHARD SAILER, and ROLF WIESENDANGER
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3036
Application 08/268,094
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 2
through 4, 7 and 10 through 11, as amended in the amendment after final (see the amendment
filed November 16, 1995, Paper No. 11, entered as per the Advisory Action mailed December 1,
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007