Appeal No. 1997-3036 Application No. 08/268,094 Observation In the event of further prosecution of this application, we note that claim 4 recites that "A, T, and n are as defined in claim 1." Claim 1 was canceled by appellants with the Amendment Under Rule 115 filed December 6, 1994. As such, claim 4 refers to a canceled claim for the definition of variables A, T and n. This discrepancy should be resolved upon further prosecution. Conclusion To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2-4, 7 and 10-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Fekete or Takiyama in view of Green or Kajiwara is Reversed. REVERSED TERRY J. OWENS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PAUL LIEBERMAN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) MPT:lmb 13Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007