Ex parte PHAN - Page 8




             Appeal No. 1997-3103                                                                                 
             Application 08/449,647                                                                               


             this claim and one of the other claims, i.e., claim 3.  See In                                       
             re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565, 1566 n.2, 37 USPQ2d 1127, 1129 n.2                                          
             (Fed. Cir. 1995); 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(1995).                                                        
                                 Rejection of claims 3 and 13 under                                               
                       35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Pigneul                                         
                                                    Claim 3                                                       
                    Pigneul discloses an absorbent structure which includes a                                     
             macroscopically monoplanar fibrous capillary substrate                                               
             defining an X-Y plane and a Z-direction orthogonal thereto                                           
             (figure 3, item 51; col. 3, lines 39-43; col. 4, lines 62-65).                                       
             The substrate has at least one blind hole aperture (figure 3,                                        
             item 52; col. 4, line 66 - col. 5, line 2).  A freestanding                                          
             site of osmotic absorbent hydrogel polymer is joined to the                                          
             substrate in an aperture, extends in the X-Y direction (figure                                       
             3, plane perpendicular to the paper), and is capable of                                              
             expanding in the Z-direction (figure 3, vertical direction)                                          
             without constraint from the substrate upon imbibing liquids.                                         
                    Thus, Pigneul discloses each element recited in                                               
             appellant’s claim 3.                                                                                 




                                                       -8-8                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007