Ex parte LEVINE et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                            Ex parte STEPHEN R. LEVINE,                               
                                   ALEX J. HARUI,                                     
                                  KAREN DONOGHUE,                                     
                               MICHAEL W. SCHIRPKE,                                   
                               and STEPHEN P. BOYLAN                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-3130                                  
                               Application 08/483,772                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                   
          34 through 45.                                                              
               The disclosed invention relates to a video display in a                

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007