Appeal No. 1997-3133 Page 5 Application No. 08/370,076 configuration. Any change in the scan path configuration will go unnoticed in Hassan and lead to erroneous results. While Hassan discloses test generation and diagnosis for verifying the interconnections of integrated circuits, there is no suggestion of determining a post-test configuration of the scan path and certainly no suggestion of comparing it with a pre- test configuration of the scan path. Independent claim 18 recites, more specifically, that there is a determination of the actual bit length of the scan path in the post-test configuration. While the examiner does not explain, with any degree of specificity, the significance of Parker or how or why it is being applied, ostensibly, the examiner relies on Parker for the determination of actual bit length of a scan path. Appellants point to Figure 5 of Parker where a diagnosis step immediately follows a “stop testing” step. Accordingly, it appears reasonable that Parker performs no action between stopping the test and diagnosing any faults, unlike the instant claimed invention wherein a shift in signature pattern through the scan path occurs in a post-test configuration in order to determine the actual bit length of the scan path in the post-test configuration. The examiner’sPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007