Ex parte SCOTT et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 17              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte KENNETH C. SCOTT,                               
                                MATTHEW C. YEATES,                                    
                                  DAVID S. KAGELS,                                    
                               and STEPHEN H. WATSON                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-3225                                  
                               Application 08/351,218                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LALL, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 7, 9, 11 through 37, 41 through 52, 54, 56                 



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007