Appeal No. 1997-3243 Application 08/290,093 examiner’s rejection. Because no prima facie case of obviousness has been established, we need not address appellant’s evidence of commercial success. See In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984); In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1052, 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976). DECISION The rejection of claims 10, 13-18 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Parrotta in view of Sakai is reversed. REVERSED 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007